The Influence of the Firefighter Recruit Academy Instructor: An Exploratory Case Study

Abstract:

This qualitative, single exploratory case study examined the influence of Firefighter Recruit Candidate Academy (RCA) instructors on recruits’ personal and professional development. Conducted at a university in the Western United States, the study analyzed reflective journals that recorded the weekly experiences of 18 recruits over a 15-week training period. The data analysis revealed that RCA instructors model a role that extends beyond imparting firefighting skills and knowledge. The findings revealed that RCA instructors create a positive learning community, provide feedback that promotes growth, build trust-based relationships, display professionalism outwardly, and share knowledge with the next generation of firefighters. The study highlighted the RCA instructor’s role as one who not only strives to develop the skills and abilities of future firefighters but also serves as a role model for whom those they train seek to become.
Key Words: Firefighter, Firefighter Recruit Training, Fire Service Instructor, Qualitative, Case Study, Mentorship, Role Model


The Influence of the Firefighter Recruit Academy Instructor: An Exploratory Case Study

Most future firefighters begin their journey at a recruit candidate academy (RCA), where they have their first interactions with professionals in the field serving as academy instructors. For RCA instructors, teaching is a secondary role that complements their primary job as uniformed and sworn firefighters or functions as a second career after retirement. Even though they often work in part-time or adjunct roles, these instructors find meaning in helping to shape the next generation of the fire service (Lewis, 1999). Their dual position as both professional and educator connects real-world experience with education, enabling them to influence recruits in ways that extend beyond just technical training to serving as a role model for those who desire to serve (Barabasch & Rauner, 2011).

While national standards dictate what must be taught to recruits, the method of instruction is somewhat left to the discretion of the different academies (NFPA, 2019). Within this space, the individual instructor’s influence becomes significant, extending beyond teaching skills and evaluating abilities to serve as a personal example and mentor for future recruits (Lee, 2020). In other words, the influence of instructors affects student development as a person, where educators change lives, inspire learners, and guide them through challenges and personal growth (Rich, 2015). This represents the lived experience of the RCA instructor, who prepares students for certification while also helping shape their identity as future professional responders (Watkins et al., 2019).

This exploratory single case study examined how RCA instructors influence recruits’ learning experiences and development beyond standardized skills. It focused on the effects RCA instructors have, in the words of the study’s participants who successfully completed the academy, on not only their professional development but also the personal growth of those pursuing careers in fire and emergency services. The central question guiding the study asked how the RCA instructor’s influence extends beyond the teaching of mandated technical skills, thereby affecting the professional and personal development of firefighter recruits.

To conduct the study, the researchers gathered reflective journals from participants enrolled in a 15-week firefighter recruit candidate academy. These journals were collected once the academy ended and the recruits had graduated. In their weekly journaling assignment, recruits are asked to reflect on their experiences during each week of training in the academy. Weekly, the recruits are asked to reflect on the following three areas: (1) describe your overall experience in the fire academy this week, (2) describe an important lesson you learned or took away from your academy experience this week, and (3) describe what important lessons you learned about yourself this week. In a previous study on the lived experiences of recruits, data analysis found that recruits frequently referred to their experiences and interactions with their instructors (Russell et al., 2023). These reflections occurred despite the journaling assignment not providing direct prompts regarding the instructors’ presence and behaviors; the recruits consistently reflected on their influence and impact. The previous study provided the need to go further and understand the influence of RCA instructors on recruits in their own words (Russell et al., 2023).

Literature Review

The literature review that informed this study focuses on two key areas, firefighter training and the impact of teachers on learners, which extend beyond the traditional classroom setting. The influence of teachers on learners as individuals is somewhat overlooked, with most educational research focusing on measurable, quantifiable outcomes (Billett et al., 2022; Roxå & Marquis, 2019). Learners at all levels of academia spend a significant amount of time with their educators, forging, in many cases, meaningful relationships through mentoring and coaching. Thus, there is a need to understand the educators’ influence on learners beyond standardized testing and evaluation.

The educator influences learners as individuals, not just their theoretical and technical understanding (San-Martín et al., 2022). Again, this aspect is often overlooked in academic research (Roxå & Marquis, 2019). Depending on the area of instruction, the educator can become the role model, i.e., the person the learner strives to emulate (San-Martín et al., 2022). However, their influence can extend beyond that of a role model or mentor, leading learners to desire to embody the qualities or imitate the behaviors of instructors (Tiedens & Fragale, 2003; Van Maanen, 1973). In firefighter training at the recruit level, the instructor, who is typically an experienced professional, is whom the recruit aspires to become, with whom they hope to serve one day, and they aim to impress (Russell, 2019; Van Maanen, 1973). Identifying the influence of the academy instructor on the recruit holds potential for helping educators understand the impact they have on the lives of learners that goes beyond teaching job skills and knowledge.

Firefighter Training

            The recruit candidate academy exists to expose, educate, assess, challenge, and prepare recruits for national certification and entry-level firefighter positions with professional fire and emergency service agencies (Klinoff, 2025). Firefighter training is conducted through a paramilitary approach, where the training environment mimics the fire service structure (Templeman, 2021). The RCA trains and certifies recruits to the Firefighter II and Hazardous Materials Operations level, which is the standard entry-level minimum for fire-rescue agencies, not including minimal licenses in emergency medical services (NFPA, 2019b). During their academy experience, recruits learn concepts and develop skills in various areas, including fire behavior, hose advancement, search and rescue, hazardous materials and CBRN identification, installed fire protection systems, and salvage-overhaul practices (Corbett, 2019; NFPA, 2019b). Each area is tested for cognitive and psychomotor mastery, culminating in a comprehensive national certification test delivered by an accredited fire certification agency (NFPA, 2019b).

The academy experience is conducted by a cadre of certified and experienced fire service instructors (Flannery, 1997; Lewis, 1999; NFPA, 2019a; Reeder & Joos, 2019; Stowell & Adams, 2006; Watkins et al., 2019). Each instructor is certified in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 1041 Standard for Fire Service Instructor Qualifications (NFPA, 2019a). As educators, the RCA instructor adheres to a structured set of teaching standards (NFPA, 2019b), incorporating professional experiences and nuanced knowledge from their practical work into lessons to enhance learning (Reeder & Joos, 2019). Each lesson is presented to the recruit in accordance with the NFPA 1001 Standard for Professional Firefighter Qualifications. Due to national accreditation standards and occupational training guidelines, firefighter recruits across North America are trained in a manner that allows them to function, aside from subtle agency-specific nuances, as part of a firefighting crew, regardless of agency or geography (Corbett, 2019). This standardized occupational training facilitates the generalization of this study’s findings across various fire emergency services training organizations throughout North America (Yin, 2018).

The Influence of Teachers

The instructor’s character influences the learner’s perception (Gruber et al., 2012). This means that the outward behavior of those tasked with educating others, apart from the quality of instruction, impacts how learners perceive the subject matter. In the case of the firefighter recruit, such influence, based on the instructor’s character, affects their perceptions of the profession (Gruber et al., 2012). In their role as instructors, they become representatives of the larger uniformed and sworn professional fire service. The average firefighter recruit is limited in their knowledge and experience with the fire service. Thus, the instructor shapes their understanding of what a firefighter is and what they are supposed to be, beyond, say, an immediate family member who is a firefighter.

As noted earlier, within the RCA experience, the instructor serves as a role model for the recruit, thereby transcending traditional teacher-student relationships (Barretti, 2007; Bettinger & Long, 2005; Dake & Taylor, 1994; Gibbs & Kulig, 2017; Nelms et al., 1993; Nouri et al., 2014). In this relationship, the instructor goes beyond simply disseminating knowledge to embodying the qualities that the learner aspires to achieve. Positionally, the instructor is granted power because learners regard them as both an example and an expert, resulting in recruits trusting the instructor. Therefore, the character of the RCA instructor is as significant as their knowledge and ability to impart it (Woolfolk & Brooks, 1985).

Kim et al. (2023) note that the instructor-recruit relationship is based on trust. For the RCA instructor, trust means recruits trust that they will keep them safe in what is considered a dangerous training ground by the very nature of the work. Moreover, learners trust that the behavior of the RCA instructor is what they can expect from themselves in the fire service. The influential role of the RCA instructor thus extends beyond simply disseminating information and performing evaluations (Garniewicz, 2022; NFPA, 2019b). This expands the role of the fire service instructor into areas such as leading by example, serving the needs of others, setting ethical standards, professionalism, communication skills, handling stress and pressure, mentorship, guidance, teamwork, camaraderie, and upholding professional values (Flannery, 1997; Russell, 2019; Stowell & Adams, 2006). This realization makes the role of an RCA instructor one that transcends the stereotypical job description of a vocational instructor (Gordon & Schultz, 2020).

Purpose of Present Study

The influence of teachers on learning has been researched at various levels of education and across academic disciplines for decades (Beausaert et al., 2013; Csikszentmihalyi & McCormack, 1986; Dahlke et al., 2012; Schumann et al., 2009). The literature highlights how the teacher’s approach influences and enhances learning, fosters engagement, and raises standardized test scores (Beausaert et al., 2013; Rocca, 2010). The focus is primarily on measurable outcomes rather than on the processes of becoming or being. This study aims to explore, beyond standard testing and measurements, the concept of the instructor’s influence on a recruit’s personal growth in their journey toward becoming a professional firefighter.

Methodology

This study was conducted at a university in the Western United States. Employing an exploratory case study design, the researchers systematically explored underlying themes using the collected data (Seawright & Gerring, 2008; Stake, 1995; Yin, 2018). An exploratory case study was chosen over other qualitative designs because it examines unique, uncontrollable situations that can shed light on theoretical propositions (Yin, 2018). The researchers obtained approval from the University Institutional Review Board (IRB) before commencing the study.

Employing a purposive sampling approach (Corbin & Strauss, 2008; Patton, 2014), the researchers selected participants from a specific group, enabling targeted theoretical insights in situations where shared experiences are significant (Patton, 2014). The initial sample consisted of archival data from the weekly reflective journal entries of n = 24 participants spanning the 15-week academy. However, data saturation was reached when no new themes emerged during analysis, which occurred by the 18th participant’s journal. These entries captured recruits’ reflections, insights, and moments of realization, using pseudonyms to protect their anonymity. The demographics of the participants (n=18) involved an age range of 21 to 29, with 17 identifying as male and one as female. The archival data collected from the participants’ reflective journals included 48,405 words. The researchers utilized manual hand-coding of the data, which enabled in-depth reading and color-coded attributes, supplemented by researcher note-taking (Basit, 2003; Stake, 1995; Yin, 2018). The researchers also coded the data electronically using Delve™ qualitative coding software to maintain data analysis reliability (Basit, 2003).

The coding process began by identifying overarching codes that identified single words and phrases (Yin, 2018). After de-identifying and organizing the reflective journals by participant and week, the researchers conducted an iterative, tiered coding process using constant comparison. The process started with multiple immersion readings and analytic memoing to identify instructor-related passages that naturally emerged in recruits’ reflections. During the first coding cycle, the researchers used open, descriptive labels, often based on participants’ own words, to capture single words, phrases, and short segments, for example, expectations, presence, and role modeling. These codes were continuously compared across participants and weeks to refine boundaries, eliminate redundancies, and clarify definitions. In the second cycle, conceptually similar codes were grouped into broader themes, leading to an overarching finding (Yin, 2018), instructor influence on learners, and a set of distinct subthemes, such as supportive and engaging, positive learning environment, and professionalism and trust. Representative quotations supporting each code are presented in the results and discussion sections to illustrate how participant language grounded the overarching theme in the data.

To enhance dependability, researchers used both manual coding and DelveTM qualitative coding software, then compared the results. Any discrepancies were resolved through iterative coder consensus meetings in which code definitions and thematic placements were revisited until consensus was reached (Miles et al., 2019). The process resulted in the final code structure, as shown in the results tables. Coding continued until thematic saturation (n = 18) was achieved, meaning no new codes or subthemes emerged (Mason, 2010). The data analysis disclosed and interconnected core categories with their attributes, thus forming the foundation for the study’s theoretical development (Yin, 2018). The study’s theoretical findings are presented in the results section, followed by the discussion section, which provides narrative case descriptions based on the sub-themes.

Results

The results section presents the systematic coding process used to analyze participants’ reflective journals and to uncover the influence of the RCA instructor. The exploratory case study design facilitated the identification of an initial overarching theme and supporting thematic codes regarding the learners’ impressions of the instructor (see Table 1). These initial thematic codes served as the basis for deeper insights derived from the participants’ words and the subsequent development of subthemes.

 

 

 

 The Development of Subthemes

The initial thematic codes revealed participants’ appreciation for the instructors’ dedication, professionalism, commitment to pushing them to their limits to foster growth, adherence to standards, willingness to provide additional guidance, and understanding. It was discovered that the participants recognized the importance of the instructors in their training and development, viewing them as essential guides in their journey (see Table 2). The thematic subthemes from the coding process collectively portray instructors as supportive, challenging, knowledgeable, and dedicated to helping students succeed and grow throughout their training.

 

 

Discussion

The results of this study highlight the influence of RCA instructors on recruits. This influence extends beyond the standard teaching of firefighting skills and knowledge, permeating into the personal development of the recruits. The findings underscore the role of RCA instructors in shaping the future of the fire service. Instructors are not only educators but also mentors, role models, and leaders who have a significant impact on recruits’ personal and professional development. The emergent themes presented in this discussion highlight the role of RCA instructors and their influence on the personal and professional development of recruits (Rich, 2015).

Supportive and Engaging

The role of Supportive and Engaging emerged as a factor in recruits’ positive experiences in the RCA; as Roxå and Marquis (2019) note, this is an important dimension of teaching. RCA instructors went beyond delivering technical content to foster an environment where recruits felt individually valued and emotionally supported. Participants noted that instructors invested time and effort into individualized mentorship, helping them navigate the program’s demands. One recruit reflected, “I am very pleased with the instructors and the time and help they are putting into me as an individual,” indicating appreciation and a sense of being supported.

Supportive instructors also helped mitigate the emotional stress recruits experienced. When learners believe their instructors care about their development and well-being, it enhances motivation and self-efficacy (Lee, 2020; Van Maanen, 1973), One participant asserted, “I felt that I had screwed everything up and let everyone down and that my efforts had not met the expectations of the instructors at all [sic],” thus highlighting the vulnerability recruits often feel in high-pressure training environments. However, the instructor’s encouragement and empathy managed and transformed this vulnerability. This suggests that instructors establish a psychologically supportive environment for recruits to grow.

Challenging and Motivating

The theme of Challenging and Motivating captures how RCA instructors intentionally fostered stress-resilient mindsets among recruits by maintaining high expectations and deliberately pushing them to operate beyond their comfort zones. This is where instructor behaviors stretch learners and simultaneously motivate them when paired with perceived care and guidance (Lee, 2020).

Recruits consistently noted the intensity of the instructors’ training approach. One participant remarked, “Surprisingly, one of my favorite parts of the course thus far is how committed to stressing you out the instructors are.” While this might appear to be a negative experience, recruits interpreted it as a constructive pressure designed to prepare them for the realities of emergency response work, emphasizing stress inoculation in paramilitary-style training environments (Templeman, 2021).

The challenge posed by instructors was not arbitrary but purpose-driven. One recruit shared, “They push us to be the best that we can be, and they make us push our limits.” Thus, the challenge becomes a transformative influence, i.e., helping students achieve personal growth through structured adversity (Rich, 2015). The participants interpreted these high standards as a commitment to their success.

Fairness and High Standards

The theme of Fairness and High Standards reflects the RCA instructors’ upholding expectations while maintaining equitable treatment for all recruits. Participants consistently described instructors as both demanding and fair. One recruit emphasized, “The instructors are fair, but they ensure that our training is to their standard, and if it is not, we keep going.” This highlights a sense of procedural justice, where learners respond positively to high expectations (Kim et al., 2023).

Maintaining uniform standards across all aspects of training ensured that performance evaluations were viewed as legitimate. Another participant noted, “Instructors are doing a great job at helping us in every way they can. They have given us a lot of review time and study time to ensure we are getting as much help as possible.” This demonstrates that fairness was not simply about equal treatment, but also about providing support (Garniewicz, 2022). Fairness and high standards had a modeling function by holding recruits accountable and embodying the standards themselves; instructors exhibited what would be expected of recruits in the field (Woolfolk & Brooks, 1985).

Approachable and Knowledgeable

The theme of Approachable and Knowledgeable highlights how recruits responded not only to the expertise of their RCA instructors but also to their accessibility and willingness to engage. These qualities created a learning environment where recruits felt safe asking questions and seeking guidance.

Recruits repeatedly emphasized the balance instructors struck between maintaining authority and being accessible. One participant reflected, “The instructor was one of those who wanted us to succeed. He made sure everyone was able to understand every concept,” signaling respect for their expertise while acknowledging their openness to support. This blend of knowledge and approachability appears to allow recruits to trust their instructors (Kim et al., 2023).

Approachability was particularly meaningful during moments of personal struggle. One recruit noted, “The Instructor gave me some great advice on controlling my nerves, and I think it taught me a great lesson.” The ability of instructors to address recruits’ stress, fears, or uncertainties by offering practical advice played a role in shaping recruit confidence and helping them grow (Gruber et al., 2012; Law et al., 2020; Perez, 2019).

Positive Learning Environment

The theme of a Positive Learning Environment emphasizes how RCA instructors fostered an atmosphere where recruits felt energized, respected, and emotionally supported, thereby creating a space that facilitated learning and professional growth. Instructors shaped the academy’s environment, helping recruits remain motivated and connected to the learning process. Recruits described the academy as both rigorous and meaningful. One participant noted, “My overall experience in the fire academy this week was exhilarating,” signaling a sense of enthusiasm tied directly to the environment instructors created. This reflects a balance of challenge and engagement (Csikszentmihalyi & McCormack, 1986). For example, as one recruit noted,

“I am almost done, but then I realized I only have three weeks left, and I kinda got sad; I am learning from some of the best firefighters in the state of Utah, some of these instructors I might not see again, and I have come to like being around them and listening to what they have to say [sic].”

This reflection highlights a sense of community and belonging that the instructors cultivated (Gibbs & Kulig, 2017; Van Maanen, 1973). The tone established by instructors seemed to help mitigate the psychological demands of a paramilitary training structure. Despite the physical and mental stress inherent in the program, the instructors’ efforts to foster a respectful, encouraging climate made recruits more willing to engage fully, take risks, and make mistakes.

Constructive Feedback and Improvement

The theme of Constructive Feedback and Improvement reflects how RCA instructors used feedback not merely as a corrective mechanism, but as a developmental tool. Effective feedback in this setting was personalized, timely, and delivered in a manner that encouraged growth rather than discouragement. One recruit noted,

“I had a student evaluation at the beginning of the week, and a big thing the instructors went over… was getting to the next level. I think a big part is putting myself in a situation where I am more uncomfortable and being put in a position where I can grow.”

Growth occurs when learners are pushed beyond their comfort zone and still feel supported (Beausaert et al., 2013). This reflection illustrates the importance of feedback that invites challenge.

Recruits also shared how emotional states, such as anxiety or fear, affected their performance and how instructors responded to these moments with understanding. For instance, one recruit admitted, “I let my nerves and stress get to me during a skill sheet, and it ruined my performance.” Instructors utilized such instances as teaching opportunities, where emotionally attuned feedback enhanced learning in a supportive environment, allowing students to master skills and abilities (Dahlke et al., 2012; Reeder & Joos, 2019; Templeman, 2021).

Relationship and Community Building

The theme of Relationship Building emphasizes the interpersonal connections that develop between RCA instructors and recruits. These relationships became foundational to the recruits’ confidence, sense of belonging, and motivation. Participants described how instructors took notice of their efforts and recognized leadership potential. One recruit shared, “It made me feel really good to have all my classmates and some of the instructors tell me I did a really good job leading the evolution.” This moment of affirmation reinforced a sense of support and camaraderie among a community of learners and instructors.

Relationships with instructors were also characterized by warmth and humanity, even amid the academy’s disciplined structure. As one recruit noted, “I really enjoy getting to know the instructors more and more. I know we aren’t trying to be friends with them, but sometimes their kindness slips.” This observation underscores the balance between authority and approachability, where mentorship naturally develops through shared experiences (Roxå & Marquis, 2019; San-Martín et al., 2022). This relationship promotes both recruits’ academic success and personal growth (Law et al., 2020).

Professionalism and Trust

The theme of Professionalism and Trust captures how the conduct of RCA instructors did more than model technical competence; they represented the standards to which recruits aspired. Their behavior helped define what it meant to be a professional firefighter, both in form and substance. Trust was a recurring element in the recruits’ reflections. One participant observed, “An important lesson that I learned in the RCA this week was that you have to trust the instructors. Those men are smarter and more trustworthy than you could ever imagine, and when they say to do something, you have to believe and trust them [sic].” This demonstrates how trust allowed recruits to follow guidance in a high-stakes training environment.

Professionalism was not performative; it was deeply relational, wherein authority was exercised not to control but to elevate (San-Martín et al., 2022). As one recruit noted,

“Instructors are here to see us succeed, not to fail. They want what is best for us, which means they will be hard on us, but we will become our best selves through that process if we allow ourselves to.”

These sentiments reflect instructors’ dual role as technical experts and moral exemplars. Gruber et al. (2012) found that students’ perception of instructor credibility increases when authenticity and care accompany professionalism. The instructors’ professionalism was experienced daily through their conduct, fairness, and genuine student investment. In turn, recruits responded with trust, respect, and a desire to reflect the same professionalism as they transitioned into the fire service.

Emphasis on Learning

The theme of Emphasis on Learning highlights RCA instructors’ commitment to developing the ability of recruits. Participants noted how instructors encouraged them to take ownership of their education. One recruit reflected, “I will need to take more initiative and leadership opportunities, as well as do things to show the instructors that I am doing well in the class and can perform well.” This self-directed attitude, active engagement, is an essential transition for adult learners preparing for a demanding career (Beausaert et al., 2013).

Learning was also made memorable through practical application. As one recruit humorously put it, “I loved learning about ventilation even though I almost cut my leg off.” This lighthearted reflection illustrates how instructors created hands-on, realistic scenarios that engaged recruits on cognitive, emotional, and kinesthetic levels, preparing recruits for the unpredictable nature of real-world firefighting (Reeder & Joos, 2019; Templeman, 2021). Participants expressed appreciation for this learning-focused culture, where mistakes were viewed as opportunities for growth and development.

Balancing Toughness and Understanding

The Balancing Toughness and Understanding theme captures RCA instructors’ approach to maintaining discipline and high expectations while demonstrating encouragement and support. This balance was essential in helping recruits develop their abilities without becoming discouraged. Recruits frequently noted the rigor of the training but framed it positively when paired with instructor support. One participant shared, “I know there is a lot more to come, but already I can see myself growing into a stronger person because of our instructors, the other recruits, and myself.” This comment reflects a process of transformation, where one becomes aware that overcoming challenges leads to personal growth (Rich, 2015).

Another recruit described how instructors acknowledged their work ethic: “The instructors pulled me aside and told me they wanted me to assume this position because of how hard I worked.” Recognition like this affirms that instructors were observing performance and responsive to individual effort and potential (San-Martín et al., 2022).

Practical Implications

Collectively, these findings highlight the broader significance of instructor influence within firefighter recruit academies. This study demonstrates that recruit academy instructors play an important role in shaping who recruits become, not just what they can do. By identifying specific instructor behaviors that foster trust, resilience, and professional identity, the findings offer actionable insights for improving instructor training and leadership development within fire academies. When instructional influence is understood as developmental rather than purely technical, training programs can more intentionally prepare recruits for the interpersonal, ethical, and high-stress realities of fire service work.

Limitations and Recommendations

While this study offers insights into the influence of RCA instructors, it also has several limitations. First, the study’s sample size was small, with n = 18 participants, which was enough for data saturation. Although this suffices for qualitative case study analysis, more participants are needed to generalize the findings. Future research with larger and more diverse samples could produce more broadly applicable results. Second, the study was conducted at a single university in the western United States; therefore, the findings may not be fully applicable to RCA programs in different geographic areas or organizational structures. Variations in regional training standards beyond NFPA requirements, cultural factors, and instructor profiles could also affect the outcomes. Third, the primary data source was reflective journals written by the recruits. While these provide insights into the recruits’ perspectives, they may also carry individual biases, such as the desire to present oneself favorably or perceived expectations from instructors. Future studies could incorporate additional data sources, such as direct observations, interviews, and surveys, to validate the findings. Fourth, the study only included reflections from recruits who completed the academy, excluding those who struggled or failed to finish the program. Understanding the experiences of unsuccessful recruits can provide a more comprehensive picture of how instructors influence participants, both positively and negatively. Fifth, only one participant in the study was female. Future studies are needed that focus on female recruits’ perspectives.

This study offers insights into the influence of RCA instructors on recruits. However, further research is necessary to expand upon these findings and explore additional aspects of this influence. Future studies are needed to examine the long-term effects of the RCA instructor’s influence on recruits’ careers and overall well-being, and to identify the specific qualities and behaviors of effective instructors to guide the selection and development of future RCA instructors.

Conclusion

This exploratory case study provided insights into the roles of RCA instructors in shaping recruits’ personal and professional development. The findings highlight that the influence of RCA instructors extends beyond the traditional transmission of firefighting skills and knowledge. Instructors foster the personal growth of others, promote a model of becoming, and cultivate a sense of relationship and community among recruits and instructors. The themes and subthemes that emerged from the study highlight the importance of RCA instructors as not only educators but also mentors and role models who shape recruits’ personal journey toward becoming professional firefighters.

The study’s discussion spotlights the RCA instructors’ ability to support and engage recruits, challenge and motivate them, maintain fairness and high standards, and provide a positive learning environment, which contributes to the recruits’ growth and success as they seek to become future responders. The instructors’ professionalism, trustworthiness, and ability to balance toughness with understanding prepare recruits as individuals, not just in skills, but also as persons.

 

 

References

Barabasch, A., & Rauner, F. (Eds.). (2011). Work and education in America: The art of integration. (Vol. 15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2272-9

Barretti, M. A. (2007). Teachers and field instructors as student role models: A neglected dimension in social work education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work27(3-4), 215-239. https://doi.org/10.1300/J067v27n03_14

Basit, T. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/0013188032000133548

Beausaert, S. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Wiltink, D. P. (2013). The influence of teachers’ teaching approaches on students’ learning approaches: The student perspective. Educational Research55(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2013.767022

Bettinger, E. P., & Long, B. T. (2005). Do faculty serve as role models? The impact of instructor gender on female students. American Economic Review95(2), 152-157. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282805774670149

Billett, S., Hodge, S., & Aarkrog, V. (2022). Enhancing the standing and status of vocational education. In S. Billett, B. E. Stalder, V. Aarkrog, S. Choy, S. Hodge, A. H. Le (Eds), The standing of vocational education and the occupations it serves: Current concerns and strategies for enhancing that standing (pp. 19-45). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96237-1

Corbett, G. P. (2019). Fire Engineering’s handbook for firefighter I and II. Fire Engineering Books.

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). The basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153

Csikszentmihalyi, M., & McCormack, J. (1986). The influence of teachers. Phi Delta Kappan67(6), 415-19. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20387675

Dahlke, S., Baumbusch, J., Affleck, F., & Kwon, J. Y. (2012). The clinical instructor role in nursing education: A structured literature review. Journal of Nursing Education51(12), 692-696. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20121022-01

Dake, S. B., & Taylor, J. A. (1994). Do as I do: The importance of the clinical instructor as role model. The Journal of ExtraCorporeal Technology26(3), 140-142. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20121022-01

Flannery, T. J. (1997). The fire service instructor and the individual learner. Fire Engineering, 150(4), 22-26. https://www.fireengineering.com/firefighter-training/the-fire-service-instructor-and-the-individual-learner/

Garniewicz, C. D. (2022). Investigation into the need for fire instructor curriculum. (Doctoral dissertation, Northeastern University). Northeastern Library Repository. https://repository.library.northeastern.edu/files/neu:4f171d763/fulltext.pdf

Gibbs, S. S., & Kulig, J. C. (2017). “We definitely are role models”: Exploring how clinical instructors influence nursing students’ attitudes towards older adults. Nurse Education in Practice26, 74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2017.07.006

Gordon, H. R., & Schultz, D. (2020). The history and growth of career and technical education in America. Waveland Press.

Gruber, T., Lowrie, A., Brodowsky, G. H., Reppel, A. E., Voss, R., & Chowdhury, I. N. (2012). Investigating the influence of professor characteristics on student satisfaction and dissatisfaction: A comparative study. Journal of Marketing Education34(2), 165-178.

health74(6), 322-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475312450385

Kim, M., Albers, N. D., & Knotts, T. L. (2023). Academic success through engagement and trust fostered by professor leadership style. Education Sciences13(6), 537. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060537

Klinoff, R. (2025). Introduction to fire protection and emergency services. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Law, D. D., Hales, K., & Busenbark, D. (2020). Student success: A literature review of faculty to student mentoring. Journal on Empowering Teaching Excellence4(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.15142/38×2-n847

Lee, L. M. (2020). How supportive behaviors of instructors and supervisors influence trainee self‐efficacy and motivation. Performance Improvement Quarterly33(3), 349-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/piq.21330

Lewis, J. C. (1999). Instructing the instructor: Staying excited about fire service Instruction. Fire

Engineering152(3), 123-126. https://www.fireengineering.com/firefighter-training/instructing-the-instructor-staying-excited-about-fire-service-instruction/

Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforschung, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-11.3.1428

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2019). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.

National Fire Protection Association [NFPA]. (2019a). NFPA 1041: Standard for fire service instructor professional qualifications. National Fire Protection Association.

National Fire Protection Association [NFPA]. (2019b). NFPA 1001: Standard for firefighter professional qualifications. National Fire Protection Association.

Nelms, T. P., Jones, J. M., & Gray, D. P. (1993). Role modeling: A method for teaching caring in nursing education. Journal of Nursing Education32(1), 18-23. https://doi.org/10.3928/0148-4834-19930101-06

Nouri, J. M., Ebadi, A., Alhani, F., & Rejeh, N. (2014). Experiences of role model instructors and nursing students about facilitator factors of role-modeling process: A qualitative research. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research19(3), 248. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4061624/

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th ed.). Sage.

Perez, W. (2019). Academically engaging recruit firefighters during recruit school at a fire academy (13813057). [Doctoral dissertation, University of Hartford]. ProQuest.  https://www.proquest.com/openview/1748c907abe313fa43bad0a48e8098d1/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y

Reeder, F. F., & Joos, A. E. (2019). Fire and emergency services instructor: Principles and

reform. Jones & Bartlett Learning

Rich, T. (2015). A worthy asset: The adjunct faculty and the influences on their job satisfaction. To Improve the Academy34(1-2), 156-170. https://doi.org/10.1002/tia2.20010

Rocca, K. A. (2010). Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review. Communication Education59(2), 185-213.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520903505936

Roxå, T., & Marquis, E. (2019). Teachers interacting with students: an important (and potentially overlooked) domain for academic development during times of impact. International Journal for Academic Development24(4), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360144X.2019.1607743

Russell, E. (2019). In command of guardians: Executive servant leadership for the community of responders. Springer Nature.

Russell, E., Broomé, R., Byrnes, A., Eddington, A., & Lindquist, C. (2023). The influence of a firefighter recruit candidate academy experience: A case study. International Public Safety Journal (IPSA), Volume 9, 23-60. https://www.academia.edu/145029354/The_Influence_of_a_Firefighter_Recruit_Candidate_Academy_Experience_A_Case_Study?sm=b&rhid=38417753380

San-Martín, P., Pérez, A., Fernández-Laviada, A., & Palazuelos, E. (2022). The effect of role model teachers on students’ entrepreneurial competencies and intentions. Education+ Training64(7), 962-980. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-03-2021-0118

Schumann, S. A., Paisley, K., Sibthorp, J., & Gookin, J. (2009). Instructor influences on student learning at NOLS. Journal of Outdoor Recreation, Education, and Leadership1(1). https://doi.org/10.7768/1948-5123.1015

Seawright, J., & Gerring, J. (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of

qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), 294-308. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290731307

Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.

Stowell, F. M., & Adams, B. E. (2006). Fire and emergency services instructor (7th ed). International Fire Service Training Association.

Templeman, J. (2021). An exploration of recruit firefighter training and adult learning principles [Masters thesis, University of Southern Queensland]. University of Southern Queensland Library. https://doi.org/10.26192/q709y

Tiedens, L. Z., & Fragale, A. R. (2003). Power moves: Complementarity in dominant and submissive nonverbal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology84(3), 558-568. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.558

Van Maanen, J. (1973). Observations on the making of policemen. Human Organization32(4), 407-418. https://www.academia.edu/70218010/Observations_on_the_making_of_policemen

Watkins, E. R., Hayes, M., Watt, P., & Richardson, A. J. (2019). Fire service instructors’

working practices: A UK Survey. Archives of Environmental & Occupational

Health74(6), 322-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/19338244.2018.1461601

Woolfolk, A. E., & Brooks, D. M. (1985). The influence of teachers’ nonverbal behaviors on students’ perceptions and performance. The Elementary School Journal85(4), 513-528. https://doi.org/10.1086/461418

Yin, R. (2018). Case study research: Design and method (6th ed.). Sage.

 

 

Areas:
Categories: General
Tagged: , , , , , ,